Fontaine v. Lacassie
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
BEASLY, J., pro tem.
Catherine Fontaine, one of the above-named plaintiffs, is the mother of the defendant Simeon Lacassie, and the latter’s codefendant is his wife, who owns a piece of land at Walnut Creek in Contra Costa County. In the month of December, 1914, Mrs. Fontaine, who was then unmarried, furnished to M'rs. Lacassie the sum of $439.50 with which to build a house on said property, as the trial court found, under an agreement between them that Catherine Fontaine might occupy the said house during her life, with the proviso that if the land was sold before her death by Mrs. Lacassie…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wooten v. . WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Sterling v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Howlin v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by12 opinions
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Nielsen v. EmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Firpo v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Canepa v. Sun Pacific, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Jensen v. Harry H. Culver & Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.