United States v. Matthews
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROTHENBURG, Chief Judge:
Despite her plea of not guilty, a special court-martial composed of officer members found appellant guilty of one specification of wrongfully using marijuana in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 112a, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. She was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge and a reduction to E-l. Appellant’s sole assignment of error is that the military judge erred when he determined that the defense opened the door to admission of the results of a commander-directed urinalysis. Finding no error, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
After…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. HavensSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. TraversUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000