Legal Opinion
Innovative Audio Video v. Friedman
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Paul G. Feinman, J.
*384The motion and cross motion have been consolidated for purpose of this decision. The plaintiff initially moved to remove this action to Suffolk County to join another action then pending in that venue. However, that Suffolk County action has since been discontinued, rendering the instant removal motion academic. For the reasons which follow, the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment and dismissal of the complaint is denied.
This is an action for breach of a sales and installation contract. The verified complaint alleges that in August 2001,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- GTF Marketing, Inc. v. Colonial Aluminum Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Stainless, Inc. v. Employers Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Stainless, Inc. v. Employers' Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Salch v. ParatoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Richards Conditioning Corp. v. OleetNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mercer v. RAILDREAMS, INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Precision Mirror & Glass v. DicostanzoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007