Legal Opinion

Porter v. Kruegel

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1913No. 2290PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals, Fifth District, in an appeal from Dallas County. Kruegel sued Porter and appealed from a judgment for defendant. Porter obtained writ of error on a judgment reversing and remanding (136 S. W., 801) on the ground of dissent by one of the judges of the Court of Civil Appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Browu

Defendant in error instituted this proceeding in the District Court of Dallas County against R. C. Porter, by petition, to set aside a judgment dismissing "a former suit by plaintiff, Kruegel, against said Porter, which had been filed in that court, wherein the plaintiff sought to recover from Porter damages for failing to prosecute two suits in the same. court, instituted and pending against parties hereafter named, which suit against Porter was set for trial on a certain day of the term of the District Court; but plaintiff was not informed of the fact that the case had been set until he saw…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bryorly v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. MBM Financial Corp. v. Woodlands Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Zidell v. BirdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Haberer v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Duke & Co. v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Galbraith v. BishopTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API