Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Tighe

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 8, 1940No. 9473PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a declaratory judgment which, in an action by appellant, Maryland Casualty Company, against appellees, Mazilla'Tighe, Ah Chong and Leong Cheung, 1 declared the rights of .the parties in respect of an automobile insurance policy issued by appellant to Ah Chong on April 3, 1937. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Tighe, D.C., 29 F.Supp. 69.

The policy comprised, inter alia, “declarations” and “insuring agreements.” The “declarations” read, in part, as follows: “The occupation of the named insured [Ah Chong] is fruit and vegetable peddler. * * * The purposes for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Butte Brewing Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. TigheDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1939

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Wagman v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. Of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  3. Schmidt v. Utilities Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  4. Raffel v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  5. Entz v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API