Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Tighe
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 11, 1939No. 4279-SPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ST. SURE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, alleging diversity of citizenship, invokes the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act (28 U.S.C.A. § 400) to have its rights determined under an automobile policy of insurance issued to defendant Ah Chong.
Defendant Mazilla Tighe brought an action in the state court against defendants Ah Chong and Leong Cheung for damages for personal injuries resulting from a collision with her while she was walking along a sidewalk in Sutter Street, San Francisco. Plaintiff had issued á policy of insurance to defendant Ah Chong, a fruit and vegetable peddler, insuring against…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Smith v. AppleSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. YeattsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. O'NeillSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wagman v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Pacific Automobile Ins. v. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. of New YorkUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- American Automobile Insurance v. American Fidelity & Casualty Company of RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- American Employers' Ins. Co. v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.