Legal Opinion

Hanlon v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1972No. Docket 10479Published

1Opinion of the Court

44 Mich. App. 1 (1972)

204 N.W.2d 722

HANLON

v.

THE FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY.

Docket No. 10479.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided November 28, 1972.

Lopatin, Miller, Bindes & Freedman and Norman L. Zemke, P.C., for plaintiffs.

Butzel, Long, Gust, Klein & Van Zile (by James D. Ritchie), for defendant.

Before: LEVIN, P.J., and V.J. BRENNAN and VAN VALKENBURG,[*] JJ.

Leave to appeal granted, 389 Mich 789.

2Per curiam

Plaintiffs were injured when one of the front tires on their automobile failed, causing their car to go out of control and strike a guardrail. Plaintiffs allege that the tire, a product of the…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Witt v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. LaBelle v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Hanlon v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API