Legal Opinion

Hanlon v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1972No. Docket 10479PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs were injured when one of the front tires on their automobile failed, causing their car to go out of control and strike a guardrail. Plaintiffs allege that the tire, a product of the defendant corporation, failed due to a defect in its manufacture. The defendant contends that the tire failed due to a cut sustained by a contact with a sharp object. A jury in the Wayne County Circuit Court returned a verdict of no cause of action; *3plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to that verdict.

Plaintiffs first allege that the trial court erred in allowing the defendant to read to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Witt v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hanlon v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Carr v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Hanlon v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Hanlon v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API