Legal Opinion

Collier v. Hirsch

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 10, 1962No. 39637PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

1. This appeal presents the same question that we considered on the former appeal of the case'—does the defendant’s motion to set aside a default judgment allege facts upon which the relief can be granted? The only factual allega tion added by the amendment is that when the plaintiff received the check on December 26, I960', he intended to retain and cash it. It is not necessary for us to decide whether the plaintiff accepted the defendant’s check as an accord and satisfaction on December 26, I9601, because this is a question of the substance of defendant’s legal defense, not a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hogg v. HoggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  2. Penn & Watson v. McGheeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Beavers v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Clements v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Pollock v. GilbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Collier v. HirschSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  2. SECURITY MANAGEMENT COMPANY INC. v. KeaslerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Collier v. HirschSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  4. Collier v. HirschSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  5. McDaniel v. DykesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API