Legal Opinion

Frank Guido v. City of Schenectady, George B. Reynolds, Raymond Wemple

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 25, 1968No. 30, Docket 31217Published

1Opinion of the Court

404 F.2d 728

Frank GUIDO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CITY OF SCHENECTADY, George B. Reynolds, Raymond Wemple, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 30.

Docket 31217.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued September 20, 1967.

Decided November 25, 1968.

Joseph Harris, Albany, N. Y. (Ungerman & Harris, Albany, N. Y., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

Michael J. Palmiotto, Schenectady, N. Y. (Adam F. Ciesinski, Schenectady, N. Y., on the brief), for defendants-appellees, City of Schenectady and Raymond Wemple.

Winifred C. Stanley, Albany, N. Y. (Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of State of N. Y., Ruth…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API