Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Hite

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 10, 1845PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Marshall

delivered the opinion of Lire Court..

In July, 1838, Martha Ann Bowling, now the wife of Thomas, commenced her action of ejectment in the name of John Doe, for the recovery of one half of lot No. 94, jn Bardstown, which was in the, possession of Thomas Hite or his tenants. In March, 1839, the same M. A. Bowling, by her next friend, filed her bill in chancery against Hite for the same property, praying for a division and for an account of rents, &c. The bill alledges that Hite, on the 12th day of April, 1832, obtained a conveyance of one half of the Jot from James Green, who owned…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. MellusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Gilmer v. MorrisUnited States Circuit Court · 1886
  3. Vega v. RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914
  4. Birch v. FunkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  5. Vega v. RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API