Legal Opinion
Carfield & Sons, Inc. v. Cowling
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 4, 1980No. 79CA1036PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULAND, Judge.
Plaintiff, Carfield and Sons, Inc., sued to recover lost profits on a building contract and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien against property owned by defendant Alda A. Cowling and leased by defendant Richard C. Schmoll. Defendant, Krug, Inc., intervened and also asserted rights to a lien. Following a trial to the court, it awarded Carfield and Krug only part of the amount claimed. Both Carfield and Schmoll appeal.
The following facts are not in dispute. Carfield entered into a contract with Schmoll whereby Carfield agreed to erect a steel building for Schmoll for a total price of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Utah International, Inc. v. Colorado-Ute Electric Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1976
- Gregerson v. WeatherlySupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
3Cited by9 opinions
- Norcon Power Partners, L.P. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Conference Center Ltd. v. TRC—The Research Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Magnet Resources v. Summit MRI, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Koch Materials Co. v. Shore Slurry Seal, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- James Cable, LLC v. Millennium Digital Media Systems, L.L.C. (In Re Broadstripe, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.