Matter of Estate of Clyde
South Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentMiller, Justice
I would affirm.
It appears to me that the majority opinion complicates otherwise simple issues by straining to avoid a definitive answer as to which version of SDCL 30-5A-3 was in effect and applicable to the facts of this case.
At the time of Geneve’s death, 30-5A-3 provided that Floyd’s right to an elective share abated upon his death. Under the 1986 amendment to 30-5A-3, his right to an elective share would have inured to the benefit of his estate.
The majority holds that under SDCL 30-5A-6, the elective share does not “vest” until publication of the first notice to creditors. I disagree. In…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- First National Bank of Minneapolis v. Kehn Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Hot Springs Independent School District No. 10 v. Fall River Landowners Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Appeal From the Final Decision of the South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division, for AdamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Johnson v. KuselSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Estate of ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.