Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Estate of Clyde

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1988No. 15882Published

1DissentMiller, Justice

I would affirm.

It appears to me that the majority opinion complicates otherwise simple issues by straining to avoid a definitive answer as to which version of SDCL 30-5A-3 was in effect and applicable to the facts of this case.

At the time of Geneve’s death, 30-5A-3 provided that Floyd’s right to an elective share abated upon his death. Under the 1986 amendment to 30-5A-3, his right to an elective share would have inured to the benefit of his estate.

The majority holds that under SDCL 30-5A-6, the elective share does not “vest” until publication of the first notice to creditors. I disagree. In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Minneapolis v. Kehn Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Hot Springs Independent School District No. 10 v. Fall River Landowners Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re Appeal From the Final Decision of the South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division, for AdamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Johnson v. KuselSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. In Re Estate of ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API