Legal Opinion

Penninger v. Reilley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Howell Circuit Court. — Hon. Joseph Cravens, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

In this case there are two blanks in the bill of exceptions, omitting papers which are called *256for by the recitals in the bill. These papers are supplied in the printed statement furnished by the appellants. The respondents, in their brief, admit that the appellants’ statement is correct. We may, therefore, accept the appellants’ printed statement, and the respondents’ admission, as in the nature of a stipulation in this court supplying these omitted papers.

The action was commenced before a justice of the peace upon a statement of cause of action, the substantial part of which charges “ that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scharff v. KleinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Swartz v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  3. Maybee v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  4. Rosenburg v. BoydMissouri Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Rottman v. FixMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. RozierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Swarens v. PfniselSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. Lamb v. BushMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Clement v. GillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. New York Store Mercantile Co. v. ChapmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API