Legal Opinion

Clement v. Gill

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court.—Hon. ■ Jacob Klein, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

The plaintiff is an undertaker. He brought the present action before a justice of the peace to recover a funeral bill from the widow and the brother-in-law of the deceased. The plaintiff recovered judgment before the justice against both defendants, from which judgment W. A. Grill, the defendant brother-in-law, alone appealed to the circuit court. ' Upon the trial in the circuit court the plaintiff again recovered judgment. The defendant appealed, and now assigns for error that upon the case made by the plaintiff’s own evidence he was not entitled to recover.

The cause was tried by the court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Scharff v. KleinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Glenn v. LehnenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  3. Carder v. PrimmMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Maybee v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  5. LaFayette Mutual Building Ass'n v. KleinhofferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  2. Schmidt v. RozierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Abba v. SmythUtah Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API