Legal Opinion

Christianson v. Cox Communications, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 27, 2025No. 3:22-cv-01290Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CRISTINA ABDALA et al., on behalf of Case No.: 22-cv-1290-RSH-MSB themselves and all others similarly 12 situated, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ Plaintiffs, MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ 14 v. THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 15 COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al., [ECF No. 43] 16 Defendants. 17 18 On October 11, 2024, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Third Amended 19 Complaint in this case. ECF No. 43. For the reasons below, the Court grants in part and 20 denies in part the motion. 21…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API