Legal Opinion

Stone v. Merrell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 9, 1945No. 31470PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD J.

There are no procedural questions presented here.

The facts in this case developed on trial in the district court are not in material controversy.

■ The plaintiff in error was by inheritance the owner of the following described real estate:

East Half (E%) of the Northwest Quarter (NWYí) and the West Half (W%) of the Southwest Quarter (SW%) of the Northeast Quarter (NE!4) of Section thirty-two (32), Township eleven (11) North, Range eleven (11) East in Okfuskee County, State of Oklahoma,

and had been in possession thereof for a number of years. One White was her tenant. She failed to pay…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Link v. SchlegelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Reynolds v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Clark v. KeithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Casey v. KitchensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Wilson v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Stone v. MerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Stone v. Miracle, Dist. JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Stookey v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API