Legal Opinion

Holland v. Tjosevig

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1919No. 15470PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Hall, J., entered April 4,1919, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for money paid, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Main, J. —

J. — The purpose of this action was to recover money which the plaintiff had paid on a promissory note, he claiming that it was the primary obligation of the defendant. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact, conclusions of law and a judgment sustaining the plaintiff’s right to recover. From this judgment, the defendant appeals.

On April 6, 1908, the appellant and respondent, at Valdez, Alaska, signed and delivered a promissory note payable to A. L. Levy & Company, and due six months after date. The note was a joint and several obligation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reid v. FlippenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  2. Thayer v. DanielsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Barnsback v. ReinerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
  4. Wilson v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  5. Shepard v. OgdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1840

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Leuning v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Fithian v. JamarCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Eder v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Ilg v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. Dittmar v. Frye & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API