Legal Opinion

Field v. Clippert

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Replevin. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts . are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Long.

We shall not discuss this case, or pass upon any of the questions raised in the record, except' the action of the trial court in disposing of it before the parties or either of them had rested.

The action was replevin. After the plaintiffs had introduced their testimony, and while the case was yet in the hands of the defendant, the court directed the jury to render a verdict for the defendant for a return of the property. The facts in relation thereto, as stated in the record, are as follows:

cfMr. Kane [attorney for defendant] stated that he wished to offer further testimony to show the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smalley v. McGrawMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Williamson v. HollowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Whitcher v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API