Womack v. Horton
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
The sole issue on this appeal is whether the trial court was right in deeming plaintiff’s requests for admissions admitted because the responses were not filed within the thirty days allowed by ARCP Rule 36 (b). We find the trial court was correct. Jurisdiction is in this court under Rule 29 (1) (c).
After the complaint and answers had been filed, the plaintiff, on September 9,1983, filed seventeen requests for admissions. At the same time, copies of the requests were mailed to the defendant’s attorney. On October 27, 1983, which the trial court found to be at least…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stocker v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Gatlin Ex Rel. Gatlin v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- White River Limestone Products Co. v. Mo.-Pac. Rd.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Barnett Restaurant Supply, Inc. v. VanceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chiodini v. LockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. KestersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Norrell v. GilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Belcher v. BowlingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987