Legal Opinion

Washington v. Gelsinger

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 13, 2022No. 8:19-cv-01696Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND KEITH A. WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No.: PWG-19-1696 DENISE GELSINGER, Warden, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION In response to this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Respondent asserts that the petition is subject to dismissal because the claim raised by Petitioner Keith A. Washington is without merit. ECF No. 6. Petitioner has filed a reply. ECF No. 9. No hearing is necessary to determine the matters pending before the Court. See Rule 8(a), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts and…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API