Legal Opinion

Parasco v. Pacific Indemnity Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 1994No. 94-CV-5737PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

This diversity case arising under Pennsylvania law has been brought before the Court by motion of the defendant, Pacific Indemnity Company (Pacific), which seeks dismissal of Counts II and IV of the plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons that follow, the defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted only to the extent that Count IV asks this Court to determine whether Pacific violated the Unfair Insurance Practices Act. In all other respects, the defendants’ motion will be denied.

I. HISTORY OF THE CASE

Plaintiffs Anthony…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tobye R. Markowitz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Northeast Land Company. Appeal of Tobye R. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. Schrob v. CattersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. Fedas v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Romano v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Dercoli v. Pennsylvania National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. EricksenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Klinger v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Smith v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Seidman v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Leo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API