Legal Opinion

In re Przybyla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

*9Petitioner was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on January 15, 1987, and maintained an office for the practice of law in Depew. By order entered May 3, 2002 (293 AD2d 80), petitioner was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court for acts of professional misconduct that included conversion. Petitioner was personally served on May 13, 2002, with a certified copy of the suspension order and a copy of this Court’s rule governing the conduct of suspended attorneys.

Petitioner filed an application for reinstatement on September 11, 2003. Respondent…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. In re MarinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. In re SedorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. In re PrzybylaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re CaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re LadasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re LadasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. In re PrzybylaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. In re PrzybylaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API