In re Sedor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on July 13, 1994, and maintained an office for the practice of law in Rochester. By order entered November 13, 2000, respondent was suspended for a period of six months and until fur*75ther order of the Court for acts of professional misconduct, including falsely notarizing documents, arranging loans between clients and representing opposing parties without making required disclosures regarding the potential conflict of interest.
Respondent filed an affidavit of compliance on December 14, 2000, in which he stated…
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re PrzybylaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Matter of SedorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019