Legal Opinion
Biddle v. Bradshaw
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided June 17, 2019No. 6:19-cv-06007Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION RICHARD BIDDLE and NORA BIDDLE PLAINTIFFS v. Case No. 6:19-cv-6007 JOSEPH ERNEST BRADSHAW DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Joseph Ernest Bradshaw’s Rule 12(b) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 7). Plaintiffs Richard Biddle and Nora Biddle filed a response. (ECF No. 14). Defendant filed a reply. (ECF No. 15). Plaintiffs filed a sur-reply. (ECF No. 18). The Court finds the matter ripe for consideration.1 I. BACKGROUND This case concerns an automobile collision. Plaintiffs are citizens of Arkansas who…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.