Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. White v. Douglas

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1940No. 28154PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The question for decision in this case is whether the mortgagors or the mortgagee is entitled to the possession of the property covered by the mortgage after foreclosure and sale.

W. L. White and Hazel C. White, his wife, were the owners of property covered by a mortgage, and they resided thereon, with their two minor children. February 15, 1940, Mr. White filed a declaration of homestead. Subsequently, on March 6, 1940, the Seattle Trust and Savings Bank instituted an action of foreclosure, in which Mr. and Mrs. White were made parties defendant. They were served with summons and a copy of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Whitworth v. McKeeWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. State Ex Rel. O'Brien v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Security National Bank v. MasonWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Cascade Lumber Co. v. HargisWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. North Pacific Loan & Trust Co. v. BennettWashington Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. FIRST NAT. BANK ETC. v. TiffanyWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. City of Algona v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  3. Estate of Poli v. PoliWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Security Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BuschWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Cody v. HerbergerWashington Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API