Legal Opinion
Pollack v. Nash
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 30, 1999No. 98 Civ. 6599(WCC)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
This action is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated hereinafter, the motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Stuart Pollack is an attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York, and brings this action on behalf of himself pro se, as well as on behalf of his children, Sean Pollack, Kyle Pollack, Paul Pollack, and Rachel Pollack. Sean, Kyle, and Paul are all minors, whereas Rachel attained the age of eighteen in June of 1997. Thus, Stuart seeks to represent Sean, Kyle, and…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fisk v. LettermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Koulkina v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Parent v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2011
- Houghton v. CardoneDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- Nielsen v. City of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.