Legal Opinion

Stillman v. Holmes

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided September 20, 1909Published

1Opinion of the CourtKinkead, J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $1,433.65, with interest at 6 per cent, from July 26, 1906, against James T. Holmes, as administrator of George L. Converse, deceased.

The petition contains two causes of action. The first upon a promissory note, and the second declares against the administrator upon a contract for the loan of money, now amounting to the sum of $1,433.65, which plaintiff avers he made on July 26, 1906, at the special instance and request of Elouise Stillman, who was then executrix of George L. Converse, upon the representation made by her that it was necessary to save the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clopton v. GholsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Woods v. RidleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Deery v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  4. Mosely & Eley v. NormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  5. Boggs v. WannU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API