Legal Opinion
Boggs v. Wann
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio
Decided January 17, 1893No. 4,978PublishedCited by 4 opinions
At Law. Action on promissory notes, brought by Samuel L. Boggs against Judson A. Wann, administrator de bonis non of the estate of James C. Allen, deceased, and Mary E. Allen. Heard' on demurrers to the answers.
1Opinion of the Court
TAFT, Circuit Judge.
The petition states that the plaintiff, Boggs, is a citizen and resident of Pennsylvania, and that the defendants, Judson A. Wann and Mary E. Allen, are citizens and residents of the eastern division of the northern district of Ohio. That on the 28th day of October, 1890, John 0. Allen, of Stark county, Ohio, died testate, and by his last will and testament, among other things, provided as follows*.
“Item 3. I do hereby nominate and appoint my wife, Mary E. Allen, executrix of this, my last will and testament, hereby authorizing her to compromise, adjust, release, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kilbourn v. SunderlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Austin v. . MunroNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Ferrin v. . MyrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Bennett v. ButterworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Buren v. Digges Ex Rel. LibbeySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richardson v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Wilson v. PaulyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- City of Cleveland v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1899
- Stillman v. Holmes, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1909