Legal Opinion

In re O'Keefe

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1922No. 4,990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application by Robert E. O’Keefe for reinstatement as an attorney at law. Petition denied.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion:

2Per curiam

On October 7, 1918, petitioner R. E. O’Keefe was disbarred [1] from the practice of law in this state. (55 Mont. 200, 175 Pac. 593.) He has petitioned for reinstatement, and a careful investigation and review of his case has been made by us so as to avoid any possible injustice. The attorney general was directed to make full investigation and report as to protests against petitioner’s reinstatement, and his moral fitness to practice law, which has been done, and a complete report made and filed herein by the attorney general. We have *535given the petitioner every consideration, realizing…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re O'KeefeMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. In re O'KeefeMontana Supreme Court · 1914

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re StephensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. In Re SympsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. In Re O'ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. State ex rel. Sorensen v. GoldmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API