Lafayette Orthopedic Clinic v. Guardianship of Bell
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STATON, Judge.
Lafayette Orthopedic Clinic (“the Clinic”) appeals the trial court’s determination that the Clinic is responsible for a portion of the attorney fees generated from a recovery in favor of the Guardianship of Arthur Bell. The Clinic raises one issue for our review which we restate as: whether the trial court abused its discretion by determining that the Guardianship’s recovery constituted a “common fund.”
We reverse and remand.
The facts most favorable to the judgment reveal that Bell was injured by a third party, an independent tortfeasor. Bell sought and received treatment…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bayh v. SonnenburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Skelton v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- McCullough v. Archbold Ladder Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harco, Inc. of Indianapolis v. Plainfield Interstate Family Dining AssociatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Cagle v. FlickDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1998