Legal Opinion

Freudenheim v. Eppley

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 25, 1937No. 6137PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below, the partnership J. Freudenheim & Sons brought suit against the receivers of the Pittsburgh Hotels Corporation to recover damages suffered by the alleged negligence of the defendant in failing to safely keep some $40,000 worth 'of its diamonds deposited with defendant by Sol J. Freudenheim, one of the partners, who was an alleged guest of the hotel. On trial, a verdict was had for the plaintiff for $41,893.13. Thereafter motion was made for a new trial, and pending a hearing thereof, defendants presented a petition as follows:

“That at the time of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. RedmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Moody v. KennySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dajkovich v. Hotel Waldorf-Astoria Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  2. Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  3. Opinion No. Oag 59-80, (1980), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1980
  4. SLADE VS. CAESARS ENTERTAINMENTNevada Supreme Court · 2016
  5. SLADE VS. CAESARS ENTERTAINMENTNevada Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API