Legal Opinion

Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 2, 1938No. 6224Published

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

George Maty, the original plaintiff in this case, worked for the defendant from October, 1928 until November, 1933. For almost the entire first four years, he worked in the silicate department of the defendant’s plant and for most of the last year, in the phosphate department. In the latter part of 1931, he developed a cough accompanied by other distressing symptoms which grew progressively worse. In November, 1933 his condition was diagnosed as an abscess on his lung.

Maty brought suit to recover damages for his injury on the ground that his condition was caused by the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. RedmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Boal v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  4. Grammer v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  5. Freudenheim v. EppleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API