Legal Opinion

King v. Ohren

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 18, 1990No. 1—89—2023PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rakowski

Plaintiff Lisa King brought a two-count action for injuries suffered in defendant Mabel Ohren’s kitchen on May 18, 1986. Count I sounded in negligence, and count II was brought under the Animal Control Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 8, par. 351 et seq.). The trial court granted summary judgment for defendant on both counts. King appeals the dismissal of count II only.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment when plaintiff was injured while defendant’s dog moved around underfoot. We affirm.

The undisputed facts are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fooden v. Board of GovernorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Harris v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. McEvoy v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  4. Nelson v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Forsyth v. DuggerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parikh v. GilchristAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  2. Crosson v. RuzichAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  3. Coe v. LewsaderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API