Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Newman v. Wall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 9, 1933No. 29,579PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Justice.

Habeas corpus, relator appealing from the order of the district-court discharging the writ.

Indicted for perjury, relator pleaded guilty June 23, 1932. Thereupon judgment of conviction was entered, sentencing him to confinement in the state prison until thence discharged in due course of law. On the same day execution, of sentence was stayed and relator put on probation for two years. July 19, 1932, an order was entered vacating the stay of execution and order of probation, and relator remitted to the custody of the sheriff.

There is complete absence of ground, or semblance of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re RobinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. State ex rel. Schulman v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. State ex rel. McDonald v. RileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. State ex rel. Jackson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BoydCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. State Ex Rel. Ahern v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. Dufault v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Shaw v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Breeding v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API