Legal Opinion

Paristyle Beauty Salon, Inc. v. Chandler

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson

The Circuit Court found that Chandler sustained (1) a ‘ ‘ lumbo-sacral back strain and the left inguinal hernia ’ ’; (2) that it arose out of and in the course of his employ*589ment; (3) adequate notice; and (4) that lie was entitled, in addition to certain total temporary disability payments, to a permanent disability award of fifteen percent to the body as a whole. Judgment was entered accordingly together with judgment for certain supplies, medical and hospital bills already incurred by Chandler. The employer, Paristyle Beauty Salon, Inc., is prosecuting this appeal in error.

Material evidence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atlas Powder Company v. LeisterTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  2. P. H. Reynolds & Co. v. McKnightTennessee Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re HardisonWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
  2. CNA Insurance Co. v. N. L. TransouTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Columbus Plumbing & Heating Co. v. HardisonWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Mallory & Co. v. RamseyTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Glover, Sharon v. Vanderbilt Medical CenterTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API