Legal Opinion

Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Chevron Pipe Line Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 17, 2000No. 98-40831PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:

At issue in this Texas diversity action is whether an injury to an employee of Power Machinery, Inc. (PMI), the named insured for Mid-Continent Casualty Company, “arose out of’ PMI’s independent contractor work for Chevron Pipe Line Company (CPL), Mid-Continent’s additional insured, and is, therefore, covered under PMI’s liability policy; and whether the attorney’s fees and costs awarded CPL are reasonable, their having been set in the light of a settlement agreement and following a subsequent bench trial on the issue. Regarding coverage, we AFFIRM; for…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Mathis v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Vela v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. Canal Barge Company, Inc. v. Torco Oil Company Gulfstream Trading, Ltd. CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. Evanston Insurance Co. v. ATOFINA Petrochemicals, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Kona Technology Corp. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API