Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 9, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-1513PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff, Regeania Hunter Coleman, who is proceeding pro se, filed suit on September 4, 2014, against Defendant, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, alleging claims arising out of the apparent repossession of her 2008 Lexus IS in Michigan.
Although Plaintiffs Complaint is far from a model of clarity, Plaintiff appears to allege “grand theft auto” due to Defendant’s failure to notify Plaintiff of its intent to recover the vehicle, fraud, misrepresentation, and claims under several federal criminal statutes related to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Settles v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nurriddin v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Hayman v. Bldg Metro Capital LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Nurriddin v. PerezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018