Legal Opinion

People v. Ross

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel M. Gold, J.

The police officer was unable to identify the defendant as the person who had driven the speeding car and received a summons from him. He issued a summons upon the basis of an operator’s license in defendant’s name presented to him by the driver of the car.

Defendant testified that he was the sales manager for the company owning the car; that he had not driven the car or been in it at the time of the alleged offense; that he had not received the summons from the officer or even seen him before the trial; that his custom was to leave his operator’s license with the owner’s registration card in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hull v. . LittauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. People v. HildebrandtNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. People v. BakerNew York Court of Special Session · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BucichNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API