Legal Opinion
Town of Hopkinton v. B. F. Sturtevant Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 14, 1934PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is a petition brought originally in a district court to vacate its judgment entered on December 4, 1931, pursuant to previous default, in favor of the respondent (hereafter called Sturtevant) in an action of contract wherein Sturtevant was plaintiff and the present petitioner (hereafter called the town) was defendant. In that action Sturtevant sought to recover the balance alleged to be due to it from the town on a contract for heating and ventilating equipment for a school house.
A petition to vacate judgment must be brought in the court in which was entered the judgment sought to be…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Pizer v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Brooks v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Karrick v. WetmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Russell v. FoleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Long v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Kravetz v. LipofskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Donnelly v. MontagueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Commonwealth v. SharpeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.