Legal Opinion

Grimmer v. . the Tenement House Dept. of the City of N.Y.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1912PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Motion for re-argument,

1Per curiam

The motion for a re-argument must be denied in accordance with well-established rules. Reference is made on this motion to additional provisions of the Building Code as opposed to the construction which we have adopted. We have been unable to consider that Code in its entirety, for while it was introduced in evidence on the trial, only a few sections were printed in the record and called to our attention, and we are unable to take judicial notice of its provisions.

The corporation counsel earnestly urges in substance that for many years the construction now urged by him of the various statutes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. City of New York v. New York City Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Bullock v. . CooleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Lawrence Constr. Corp. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. People v. NewmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Town of Amherst v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. In Re Acquiring Title by the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API