Legal Opinion
Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe of Indians v. Rell
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 29, 2006No. 2:92cv738 (JBA)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [DOCS. ##330, 333, 334, 335, 339, 342, 346, 347, 350, 357, 362, 364, 381]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
This case is the consolidated action composed of three separate land actions brought by plaintiff, Golden Hill Paugus-sett Tribe of Indians (“Golden Hill”), against various individuals, corporations, and the State of Connecticut. Plaintiff seeks to “restore the Golden Hill Paugus-sett Tribe of Indians to possession of certain aboriginal and reservation lands in Bridgeport, Connecticut, which lands are subject to the Indian Non-Intercourse…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rubin Sira v. R. Morton, C. Artuz, D. Selsky, and G. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. Westchester CountyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Gristede's Foods, Inc. v. Unkechuage NationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Schaghticoke Tribal Nation v. KempthorneDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Lopez v. Burris Logistics Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- All Am. Tel. Co. v. AT & T Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.