Boehm v. American Patriots
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Louisiana Court of Common Pleas.— Hon. William T. Ragland, Judge. It was the duty of the appellant^to allege and prove that the release was not only fraudulently obtained but that the check was tendered back before suit brought. Carroll v. United Ry. Co., 157 Mo. App. 247; Kingman-Moore Implement Co. v. Ernest S. Ellis, 125 Mo. App. 692.
1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, P. J.
In this action plaintiff sought to recover on a certificate issued to her husband, a member of an association organized under the laws relating to benevolent associations, the association of which the husband was a member having afterwards transferred all its members to another association of like character, the latter assuming all the obligations of the former. The loss under the certificate in case of death was payable to plaintiff. Averring these facts and that all the dues, and assessments'levied under the constitution and by-laws of the association had been paid by her husband, she…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carroll v. United Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- Goodson v. National Masonic Accident Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Kingman-Moore Implement Co. v. EllisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
3Cited by5 opinions
- Putnam v. BoyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Gilsey v. GilseyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
- Winona Wagon Co. v. FeasterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- Frey v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- Reed v. John Gill & Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1919