Henderson v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The initial issue raised in this case is error by the trial court when it refused a motion by John Franklin Henderson (Henderson) to excise from the instructions to the jury any portion that explicitly or implicitly directed the jury to follow the law as given in the instructions of the court. The second issue attacks the sufficiency of the evidence to support the element of intent to defraud in the charged offenses, two counts of obtaining property by false pretenses in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-3-407(a)(i) (Michie 1997). 1 We hold that the trial court ruled correctly…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Horning v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Gillam KerleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Griswold v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Luedtke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Daugherty v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Lapp v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Cureton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.