The Sitka
District Court, W.D. New York
In Admiralty. On exceptions to report of commissioner on the question of the amount of damages.
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
Heretofore this court condemned the steamer Sitka for her negligence in colliding in St. Mary’s river with the steamer Eliza PI. Strong. There were two collisions, the second being between the Sitka and the barge Commodore in tow of the Eliza H. Strong; and as to such collision this court held both the steamer and barge in fault and decreed a division of the damages. The decision of the court will be found in 132 Fed. 861. The Commissioner appointed herein, upon the authority of The Iroquois, 84 Fed. 697, allowed interest on the damages sustained by the Strong as against…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The ManitobaSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- The BulgariaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1897
- Stewart v. RumballDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1891
- The MahanoyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1904
- Balano v. The IllinoisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eastern S. S. Corp. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1919
- The ManhattanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1935
- Hahlo v. BenedictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- United States v. Atlantic Refining Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1935
- The J. G. GilchristDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.