Legal Opinion

The Mahanoy

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 28, 1904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit for collision. On settlement of final decree.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, District Judge.

On the settlement of a final decree, the question is presented, whether interest on the damages in a collision case, runs from the beginning, where there is joint fault and the damages are divided. The claimant contends that it should not,, because pending proceedings there is no fixed liability, which is only determined by judicial decision, citing The Itasca (D. C.) 117 Fed. 885, 893, The liability relates back, however, to the collision and it has been usual to allow interest in such cases on the damages when they commence, especially on disbursements, subject to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The ItascaDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1901
  2. The BalticDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1869

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. The WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Jett v. Texas Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
  3. The J. G. GilchristDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1909
  4. The SitkaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1907
  5. United States v. Petroleum Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API