Legal Opinion

The R.J. Armstrong Living Trust v. Holmes

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided August 21, 2025No. 3:22-cv-00375Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 THE R.J. ARMSTRONG LIVING TRUST Case No. 3:22-cv-00375-ART-CSD and DAVID C. ARMSTRONG, 5 ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS; Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 6 v. (ECF Nos. 115, 117, 124) 7 SUSAN HELEN ARMSTRONG HOLMES, 8 Defendant. 9 10 This case concerns a dispute over a non-disparagement clause in a 11 settlement agreement. The Court previously granted summary judgment to both 12 parties for various claims. (See ECF No. 141.) In that order, the Court instructed 13 the parties to meet and confer before briefing the Court on how to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commission on Ethics v. HardyNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Chateau Vegas Wine, Inc. v. Southern Wine & Spirits of America, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API