Legal Opinion

Benefiel v. Waremart, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 22, 1992No. 90-06226; CA A70262PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming the referee’s determination that her knee injury is not compensable. The evidence is undisputed that claimant fainted and fell at work while checking groceries. The Board found that claimant had failed to meet her burden of showing that the fall was work-related and was not caused solely by a condition personal to claimant. We reverse and remand.

Claimant testified that she had stayed home from work for two days because she had the flu.1 On the day of the injury, she requested permission to take another day off to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Phil A. Livesley Co. v. RussOregon Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boyd v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API