Legal Opinion

Senco Products, Inc. v. Fastener Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 26, 1958No. 55 C 109PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Senco Products, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Senco” brings this action against Fastener Corporation and Duo-Fast Co. hereinafter referred to as “Fastener”, charging infringement of two patents owned by it, Juilfs No'. 2,-671,214, hereinafter referred to as the ’214 patent and Juilfs No. 2,687,522, hereinafter referred to as the ’522 patent. These patents relate to staple drive mechanism and staple feed mechanism for portable pneumatic staplers and were issued March 9, 1954 and August 31, 1954, respectively.

Senco asks for judgment holding the two…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Cover v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. John E. Thropp's Sons Co. v. SeiberlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Hazeltine Corporation v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frantz Manufacturing Co. v. Phenix Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1970
  2. Uarco Inc. v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API