Commonwealth v. Curley
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY RANSOM, J.:
Appellant, the Associated Press, appeals from the order entered March 10, 2017, denying its motion to unseal docket entries and various documents filed in the five underlying criminal cases in this matter. After careful review, we find that the substance of the documents in question has already been disclosed to the public, and that the proffer letters are not public judicial documents and therefore are not subject to the right of disclosure. Thus, we *470reverse the trial court's order in part and affirm in part.
We adopt the following statement of facts and procedural…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of OnondagaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Virginia Gambale v. Deutsche Bank Ag, Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. CridenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Levy v. Senate of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re: Sealed Arrest Warrants Appeal of:The HeraldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- In Re: Sealed Arrest Warrants Appeal of:The HeraldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- Com. v. Bey, C. v. PG Publishing CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Williams, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Com. v. Williams, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.